A practical path from risk to operating control

Every engagement is scoped around your environment, risk profile, and desired outcome—not a generic seat-based plan.

Discuss your priorities

Three ways to engage

1. Readiness assessment

A fixed-scope engagement for leaders who need a defensible view of their current exposure and a prioritized plan.

• Architecture and delivery-workflow discovery
• AI asset, tool, identity, and data-path inventory
• Hybrid software supply chain and policy review
• Risk-ranked findings and target-state blueprint
• Executive readout and implementation roadmap

Best for: CISO, CTO, platform, and AI leaders deciding where to invest first.

2. Implementation sprint

A milestone-based build that turns the blueprint into working controls inside your existing toolchain.

• Security and delivery-platform integrations
• OPA policies and approval boundaries
• AI evaluation and red-team gates
• SBOM, artifact, and provenance workflows
• Runbooks, enablement, and handoff

Best for: teams that have a funded priority and need specialist design plus hands-on implementation.

3. Continuous optimization

An advisory retainer that keeps policies, evaluation criteria, and automation effective as threats, models, and platforms change.

• Policy and control updates
• Alert-quality and remediation tuning
• Quarterly risk and governance reviews
• New use-case assessment
• Engineering and security advisory support

Best for: organizations operating governed automation or agentic systems in production.

How scope is set

Pricing depends on environment complexity, number of delivery platforms and business units, regulatory constraints, integration depth, and the level of implementation ownership. After an initial conversation, we provide a written scope with deliverables, milestones, assumptions, and acceptance criteria.